Skip to main content
. 2019 Oct 16;39(42):8386–8397. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0725-19.2019

Table 1.

Effect of the three models on the LOSO-estimated ROIsa

Original model ROI Model tested t z p
Dimension integration Left IFG Dim. 3.354 0.008
Resp. 3.292 0.009
Cat. 3.635 0.004
Response set complexity Left IPS Dim. 0.614 1
Resp. 5.351 <0.001
Cat. 1.975 0.163
Motor cortices, left LPFC Dim. 2.478 0.067
Resp. 3.647 0.004
Cat. 1.166 0.886
Target category Left fusiform gyrus and precuneus Dim. 0.476 1
Resp. 3.463 0.006
Cat. 5.466 <0.001
Left IFG Dim. 2.832 0.029
Resp. 0.699 0.242
Cat. 4.930 <0.001
Right MTG Dim. −0.144 0.557
Resp. −1.008 0.843
Cat. 2.859 0.002
Right IFG Dim. 1.275 0.101
Resp. −0.206 0.582
Cat. 3.085 0.001

ap values displayed are Bonferroni-corrected for multiple comparisons. MTG, Middle temporal gyrus; Dim., dimension integration model; Resp., response complexity model; Cat., target category.