Table 1.
Effect of the three models on the LOSO-estimated ROIsa
| Original model | ROI | Model tested | t | z | p |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dimension integration | Left IFG | Dim. | 3.354 | 0.008 | |
| Resp. | 3.292 | 0.009 | |||
| Cat. | 3.635 | 0.004 | |||
| Response set complexity | Left IPS | Dim. | 0.614 | 1 | |
| Resp. | 5.351 | <0.001 | |||
| Cat. | 1.975 | 0.163 | |||
| Motor cortices, left LPFC | Dim. | 2.478 | 0.067 | ||
| Resp. | 3.647 | 0.004 | |||
| Cat. | 1.166 | 0.886 | |||
| Target category | Left fusiform gyrus and precuneus | Dim. | 0.476 | 1 | |
| Resp. | 3.463 | 0.006 | |||
| Cat. | 5.466 | <0.001 | |||
| Left IFG | Dim. | 2.832 | 0.029 | ||
| Resp. | 0.699 | 0.242 | |||
| Cat. | 4.930 | <0.001 | |||
| Right MTG | Dim. | −0.144 | 0.557 | ||
| Resp. | −1.008 | 0.843 | |||
| Cat. | 2.859 | 0.002 | |||
| Right IFG | Dim. | 1.275 | 0.101 | ||
| Resp. | −0.206 | 0.582 | |||
| Cat. | 3.085 | 0.001 |
ap values displayed are Bonferroni-corrected for multiple comparisons. MTG, Middle temporal gyrus; Dim., dimension integration model; Resp., response complexity model; Cat., target category.