Table 3.

Significant correlations of neurocognitive scores^a with age

Instrument	Task	Subscale	Correlation	p
NEPSY	INI inhibition	Total self-corrected errorsb	−0.16	0.02
	INS switching	Total uncorrected errorsb	−0.19	0.01
		Total errorsb	−0.18	0.01
	Auditory Attention	Total commission errorsb	−0.23	0.001
		Total omission errorsb	−0.21	0.002
	Response set	Total commission errorsb	−0.30	0.0003
		Total omission errorsb	−0.19	0.006
		Total inhibitory errorsb	−0.26	0.001
	Naming	Uncorrected errorsb	−0.19	0.004
		Total errors	−0.15	0.03
	Design copy	Process total	0.29	<0.0001
		Process local	0.28	0.00002
		Process global	0.23	0.0005
		Process motor	0.24	0.0002
		Global total	0.21	0.002
Conners' CPT	Total overall	Omission errors	−0.13	0.05
		Commission errorsb	−0.17	0.01
		Hit reaction timeb	−0.24	0.0004
		Detectability d′	0.18	0.01

Significant correlations of neurocognitive scores with age to demonstrate those measures that were included in the mediation analyses, and the direction of association of age with each score.

^aAll were raw scores, unadjusted for participant age or sex.

^bWhen transformed, those raw scores also correlated with age.