Skip to main content
. 2019 Oct 9;13:356. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2019.00356

TABLE 1.

Statistical results from regression with group, task, and covariate coefficients.

SCR Amp SCR Frequency SCL BPV Amp PR





b p-value ES CI b p-value ES CI b p-value ES CI b p-value ES CI b p-value ES CI
GROUP
CWS vs. CWNS 0.12 .38 0.16 (−0.14, 0.38) 0.19 .13 0.27 (−0.05, 0.44) 1.44 .03 0.24 (0.18, 2.70) –0.25 .19 –0.25 (−0.62, 0.12) 0.21 .92 0.02 (−3.66, 4.09)
TASK
Jaw vs. Max –0.67 ≤.008 –0.90 (−0.87, −0.48) –0.57 ≤.008 –0.81 (−0.71, −0.43) –2.25 ≤.008 –0.37 (−2.83, −1.66) 0.90 ≤.008 0.91 (0.73, 1.08) 4.10 ≤.008 0.38 (2.12, 6.09)
Sent vs. Max –0.61 ≤.008 –0.83 (−0.80, −0.43) –0.06 .49 –0.09 (−0.25, 0.12) –2.32 ≤.008 –0.38 (−2.97, −1.68) 0.97 ≤.008 0.98 (0.78, 1.16) 7.67 ≤.008 0.71 (6.06, 9.28)
Pic vs. Max –0.54 ≤.008 –0.73 (−0.72, −0.36) –0.10 .36 –0.14 (−0.31, 0.11) –2.21 ≤.008 –0.36 (−2.82, −1.59) 1.03 ≤.008 1.04 (0.85, 1.20) 7.79 ≤.008 0.72 (5.94, 9.64)
Jaw vs. Sent –0.06 .31 –0.08 (−0.17, 0.06) –0.51 ≤.008 –0.72 (−0.65, −0.36) 0.08 .78 0.01 (−0.45, 0.60) –0.06 .35 –0.07 (−0.20, 0.07) –3.57 ≤.008 –0.33 (−4.73, −2.41)
Jaw vs. Pic –0.13 .03 –0.18 (−0.26, −0.01) –0.47 ≤.008 –0.67 (−0.63, −0.32) –0.04 .88 –0.007 (−0.61, 0.53) –0.12 .03 –0.12 (−0.24, −0.01) –3.68 ≤.008 0.65 (−4.96, −2.40)
Sent vs. Pic –0.08 .15 –0.10 (−0.18, 0.03) 0.04 .69 0.05 (−0.13, 0.20) –0.12 .65 –0.02 (−0.63, 0.39) –0.06 .38 –0.06 (−0.19, 0.07) –0.12 .82 –0.01 (−1.10, 0.87)
COVARIATE
Baseline 1.14 .06 (−0.07, 2.35) 0.48 ≤.01 (0.22, 0.74) 1.07 ≤.01 (0.92, 1.23) 0.25 ≤.01 (0.08, 0.41) 0.24 ≤.01 (0.07, 0.42)
Age (mos.) 0.009 .32 (−0.03, 0.008) 0.01 .09 (0.00, 0.03) –0.08 .03 (−0.16, −0.01) –0.01 .56 (−0.03, 0.01) –0.39 ≤.01 (−0.65, −0.13)

b, beta value; Effect size (ES) are the standardized beta coefficients; CI, confidence interval. Asterisks denote statistically significant results.