Skip to main content
. 2015 Jan 28;35(4):1773–1780. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3113-14.2015

Table 1.

Neuropsychological responses to hypoxia

Baseline, raw scores Creatine, raw scores Placebo, raw scores Effect of hypoxiaa
Effect of supplementationb
t p t p
Alertness rating scale 4.1 ± 0.8 2.7 ± 0.9 2.6 ± 1.0 −4.1 < 0.001* 0.1 0.464
Complex attention 93.7 ± 16.8 86.4 ± 22.7 70.7 ± 51.5 −2.0 0.031* 1.8 0.049*
    ST, incongruent CE 1.9 ± 1.8 2.1 ± 1.8 2.0 ± 1.5 1.5 0.079 0.9 0.195
    SAT, errors 5.4 ± 3.8 6.4 ± 4.4 8.3 ± 6.9 2.4 0.017* −0.8 0.230
    CPT, CE 0.7 ± 1.2 1.1 ± 1.7 3.0 ± 5.6 2.5 0.013* −2.2 0.020*
    CPT, omission errors 0.1 ± 0.3 0.9 ± 1.9 1.8 ± 4.6 1.4 0.087 −1.1 0.140
Executive function 100.5 ± 17.9 100.9 ± 17.9 91.9 ± 28.9 −1.2 0.118 1.5 0.082
    SAT, correct 55.5 ± 9.0 56.6 ± 8.4 52.9 ± 12.4 −0.8 0.226 1.3 0.110
    SAT, errors 5.4 ± 3.8 6.4 ± 4.4 8.3 ± 6.9 2.4 0.017* −0.8 0.230
Cognitive flexibility 98.8 ± 18.2 98.9 ± 19.3 88.9 ± 31.7 −1.4 0.092 1.6 0.072
    SAT, correct 55.5 ± 9.0 56.6 ± 8.4 52.9 ± 12.4 −0.8 0.226 1.3 0.110
    SAT, errors 5.4 ± 3.8 6.4 ± 4.4 8.3 ± 6.9 2.4 0.017* −0.8 0.230
    ST, incongruent CE 1.9 ± 1.8 2.1 ± 1.8 2.0 ± 1.5 1.5 0.079 0.9 0.195
Neurocognitive index 104.2 ± 10.6 99.7 ± 14.3 92.2 ± 23.0 −2.2 0.022* 1.6 0.071
    Composite memory 106.0 ± 13.1 97.8 ± 21.2 96.1 ± 16.7 −2.1 0.029* 0.3 0.400
    Psychomotor speed 118.8 ± 18.5 114.5 ± 23.0 112.0 ± 22.9 −2.0 0.033* 0.6 0.279
    Reaction time 103.2 ± 10.6 100.7 ± 12.6 98.9 ± 13.8 −0.7 0.259 0.4 0.332
    Complex attention 93.7 ± 16.8 86.4 ± 22.7 70.7 ± 51.5 −2.0 0.031* 1.8 0.049*
    Cognitive flexibility 98.8 ± 18.2 98.9 ± 19.3 88.9 ± 31.7 −1.4 0.092 1.6 0.072

A range of composite domain (italic type) and standard neurophysiological scores were reduced by hypoxia during PLA (effect of hypoxia). CrM standard scores tended to be higher during hypoxia than PLA (effect of supplementation), suggesting that these processes were robust to the effects of hypoxia. Note that for standard neurophysiological scores, higher error scores indicate worse performance, and higher correct response scores indicate better performance. For composite domain scores, higher scores indicate better performance. The alertness rating was measured using a six-point rating scale and was reduced with hypoxia and not corrected by CrM. ST, Stroop test; SAT, shifting attention test; CPT, continuous performance test; CE, commission errors. Descriptive data are mean ± SD.

aComparisons with baseline used one-sample t tests of normalized PLA scores compared to baseline (0) to assess the effects of hypoxia.

bBetween-treatment comparisons used paired t tests of normalized scores for CrM compared to PLA to assess the effects of supplementation.

*p < 0.05;

p ≥ 0.05 and <0.1. Bold type highlights statistically significant comparisons.