Table 1.
Statistics table indicating the results of all analyses
| Manuscript | Figure | Sample | Data type | Data structure | Type of test | Multiple comparison correction | Program | Statistics | p values | Confidence intervals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| a | Current | Spacing between stimulation sessions | Non-normal distribution | Mann–Whitney (between groups; PPC group: participants receiving 3 vs 4 d of stimulation) | R | W = 36 | p = 0.327 | Mean = 0.1092, 95% CI [–0.0743, 0.2110] | ||
| b | Current | Average motion displacement | Non-normal distribution | Wilcox rank-sum (all subjects; post vs pre) | R | V = 167 | p = 0.194 | Mean = 0.0074 95% CI [–0.0032, 0.0204] | ||
| c | Current | Average motion displacement | Non-normal distribution | Mann–Whitney (parietal vs vertex) | R | W = 199.5 | p = 0.350 | Mean = –0.0099 95% CI [–0.0225, 0.0096] | ||
| d | Current | Number of censored trials | Non-normal distribution | Wilcox rank-sum (all subjects; post vs pre) | R | V = 118.5 | p = 0.155 | Mean = 2.5000 95% CI [–0.9999, 6.5000] | ||
| e | Current | Number of censored trials | Non-normal distribution | Mann–Whitney (parietal vs vertex) | R | W = 218.5 | p = 0.604 | Mean = –2.1121 95% CI [–3.0000, 0.00004] | ||
| f | 2 | Current | Whole-brain FC analysis, retrosplenial cortex | Non-normal distribution | Wilcox rank-sum (within-groups; PPC group, post hoc test, post vs pre active stimulation) | Bonferroni | R | V = 7 | p = 1.16 × 10–3 | Mean = 0.1697, 95% CI [0.0654, 0.2590] |
| g | 2 | Current | Whole-brain FC analysis, fusiform gyrus | Non-normal distribution | Wilcox rank-sum (within-groups; PPC group, post hoc test, post vs pre active stimulation) | Bonferroni | R | V = 4 | p = 4.27 × 10–4 | Mean = 0.1475, 95% CI [0.0951, 0.2132] |
| h | 2 | Current | Whole-brain FC analysis, lateral PC | Non-normal distribution | Wilcox rank-sum (within-groups; PPC group, post hoc test, post vs pre active stimulation) | Bonferroni | R | V = 1 | p = 1.22 × 10–4 | Mean = 0.1331, 95% CI [0.0777, 0.2034] |
| i | 2 | Current | Whole-brain FC analysis, superior PC | Non-normal distribution | Wilcox rank-sum (within-groups; PPC group, post hoc test, post vs pre active stimulation) | Bonferroni | R | V = 2 | p = 1.83 × 10–4 | Mean = 0.1682, 95% CI [0.0815, 0.2294] |
| j | 3A | Current | Hippocampal-LPOC FC changes (a priori) | Non-normal distribution | Wilcox rank-sum (within-groups; PPC group, post vs pre active stimulation) | R | V = 95 | p = 0.048 | Mean = 0.0867, 95% CI [0.0013, 0.2053] | |
| k | 3A | Current | Hippocampal-LPOC FC changes (a priori) | Non-normal distribution | Mann–Whitney (between groups; PPC group vs vertex group) | R | W = 93 | p = 0.034 | Mean = 0.1367, 95% CI [0.0195, 0.3257] | |
| l | 4 | Current | Hippocampal-LPOC FC changes | Non-normal distribution | Permutation test (between groups; PPC group vs vertex group) | R | Observed mean difference = 0.1795 | 95% of distribution [0.1098, 0.2536] | ||
| m | 3A | Current | Hippocampal-LPOC FC changes (a priori) | Non-normal distribution | Wilcox rank-sum (within groups; vertex group, post vs pre active stimulation) | R | V = 7 | p = 0.148 | Mean = –0.0477, 95% CI [–0.0554, 0.2357] | |
| n | 3A | Current | DLPFC-LPOC FC changes (a priori) | Non-normal distribution | Wilcox rank-sum (within groups; PPC group, post vs pre active stimulation) | R | V = 81 | p = 0.252 | Mean = 0.0444, 95% CI [–0.0344, 0.1270] | |
| o | 3A | Current | DLPFC and Hippocampal-LPOC changes (a priori) | Non-normal distribution | Wilcox rank-sum (within groups; PPC group, DLPFC-LPOC vs hippocampal-LPOC FC) | R | V = 75 | p = 0.421 | Mean = 0.0344, 95% CI [–0.0636, 0.1593] | |
| p | Current | GC-LPOC changes (a priori) | Non-normal distribution | Wilcox rank-sum (within groups; PPC group, post vs pre active stimulation) | R | V = 94 | p = 0.055 | Mean = 0.0179, 95% CI [–0.0006, 0.0434] | ||
| q | Current | GC and Hippocampal-FC changes (a priori) | Non-normal distribution | Wilcox rank-sum (within groups; PPC group, post vs pre active stimulation) | R | V = 92 | p = 0.073 | Mean = 0.0641, 95% CI [–0.0066, 0.1547] | ||
| r | Current | DLPFC and hippocampal target changes (control analysis) | Normally distributed | Paired t test (within-groups; PPC group, post vs per active stimulation) | R | t(14) = 0.949 | p = 0.359 | Mean = 0.048 95% CI [–0.061, 0.157] | ||
| S | Current | DLPFC and stimulus location changes (control analysis) | Non-normal distribution | Wilcox rank-sum (within-groups; PPC group, post vs per active stimulation) | R | V = 68 | p = 0.679 | Mean = 0.026 95% CI [–0.103, 0.121] | ||
| t | Current | Changes in PPC GC | Non-normal distribution | Wilcox rank-sum (within-groups; PPC group, post vs per active stimulation) | R | V = 92 | p = 0.073 | Mean = 0.022 95% CI [–0.005, 0.050] | ||
| u | 3B | Current | Hippocampal FC changes within Yeo Networks | Normally distributed | Paired t test (within groups; PPC group, post vs pre active stimulation) | R | t(16) = 10.96 | p = 7.6 × 10–9 | Mean = 0.0900, 95% CI [0.0725, 0.1073] | |
| v | 3B | Wang et al. (2014) | Hippocampal FC changes within Yeo networks | Normally distributed | Paired t test (within groups; PPC group, post vs pre active stimulation) | R | t(16) = 11.27 | p = 5.10 × 10–9 | Mean = 0.0169, 95% CI [0.0138, 0.0201] | |
| w | 3B | Both samples | Hippocampal FC changes within Yeo networks | Normally distributed | Paired t test (between groups; current vs Wang, active stimulation) | R | t(32) = 8.75 | p = 5.42 × 10–10 | 95% CI [0.0560, 0.0900] | |
| x | 6 | Both samples | Hippocampal FC changes within Yeo networks | Non-Normally distributed | Spearman correlation across samples (current and Wang) | R | r = 0.51 | p = 0.037 | 95% CI [0.0389, 0.7956] | |
| y | Both samples | GC changes within Yeo networks | Non-Normally distributed | Spearman correlation across samples (current and Wang) | R | r = 0.16 | p = 0.536 | 95% CI [–0.3419, 0.5989] | ||
| z | 8 | Current | Hippocampal FC changes in significant regions (p < 0.01) | Non-normal distribution | Spearman correlation (within groups; baseline hippocampal FC and hippocampal-FC changes) | R | r = 0.39 | p = 1.0 × 10–4 | 95% CI [0.2002, 0.5453] | |
| aa | Current | Hippocampal FC changes in significant regions (p < 0.01), outlier removed | Normally distributed | Pearson correlation (within groups; baseline hippocampal FC and hippocampal-FC changes) | R | r(92) = 0.47 | p = 1.14 × 10–6 | 95% CI [0.2955, 0.6141] | ||
| bb | 8 | Current | GC changes in significant regions (p < 0.01) | Non-normal distribution | Spearman correlation (within groups; baseline GC and GC changes) | R | r = –0.08 | p = 0.39 | 95% CI [–0.2593, 0.1046] |
Each analysis includes a letter indicator (“manuscript” column) linking the test in the table to the analysis in the text. The link to the corresponding figure, if any, and the sample used for the test are indicated in the “figure,” and “sample,” columns, respectively. The “current” sample includes tests using data from the current work, and the previous study is indicated as Wang et al. (2014), the dependent variables for each test are listed as “data type,” and the “data structure” column indicates whether the data are normally distributed. The type of test, contrast, and the groups used for the analysis are listed in the “type of test” column. The multiple correction method is listed under “multiple comparisons correction.” the program used to perform the analysis is included under “program.” The critical value and degrees of freedom are listed for each test under “statistics.” Finally, the p value and confidence intervals are listed in the final two columns. DLPFC, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex; GC, global connectedness; LPOC, left precuneus and medial occipital cortex.