Skip to main content
. 2019 Sep 3;84(5):1017–1026. doi: 10.1007/s00280-019-03925-z

Table 1.

Frequency of patients from all studies with potentially clinically significant abnormalities during avelumab treatment at different doses based on locally read ECGs

Parameter Patients n (%)
1 mg/kg (n = 4) 3 mg/kg (n = 18) 10 mg/kg (n = 1769) 20 mg/kg (n = 27) Total (N = 1818)
Heart rate (bpm)
  ≤ 50 and decrease from baseline ≥ 20 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 24 (1.4) 0 (0.0) 24 (1.3)
  ≥ 120 and increase from baseline ≥ 20 0 (0.0) 1 (5.6) 47 (2.7) 0 (0.0) 48 (2.6)
QRS interval (ms)
  ≥ 120 0 (0.0) 1 (5.6) 165 (9.3) 4 (14.8) 170 (9.4)
PQ/PR interval (ms)
  ≥ 220 and increase from baseline ≥ 20 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 109 (6.2) 4 (14.8) 113 (6.2)
QTcF interval (ms)
  > 450 and ≤ 480 0 (0.0) 4 (22.2) 312 (17.6) 7 (25.9) 323 (17.8)
  > 480 and ≤ 500 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 63 (3.6) 2 (7.4) 65 (3.6)
  > 500 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 44 (2.5) 0 (0.0) 44 (2.4)
ΔQTcF (ms)
 Increase from baseline > 30 and ≤ 60 0 (0.0) 7 (38.9) 393 (22.2) 6 (22.2) 406 (22.3)
 Increase from baseline > 60 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 79 (4.5) 1 (3.7) 80 (4.4)
QTcP interval (ms)
  > 450 and ≤ 480 1 (25.0) 5 (27.8) 383 (21.7) 8 (29.6) 397 (21.8)
  > 480 and ≤ 500 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 71 (4.0) 2 (7.4) 73 (4.0)
  > 500 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 41 (2.3) 0 (0.0) 41 (2.3)
ΔQTcP (ms)
 Increase from baseline > 30 and ≤ 60 0 (0.0) 5 (27.8) 351 (19.8) 5 (18.5) 361 (19.9)
 Increase from baseline > 60 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 65 (3.7) 2 (7.4) 67 (3.7)

ECG electrocardiogram, QTcF QTc derived from Fridericia’s formula, QTcP QTc derived from a project-specific formula