Skip to main content
. 2019 Sep 14;21:35–47. doi: 10.1016/j.jare.2019.09.002

Table 1.

Data analysis for distress parameter after transmitter implantation (n = 10).

Days after transmitter implantation (TI)
0 1 2 3 7 13
Figs. Distress parameter
2A Distress-score
(0–66)		 Mean
±SD		 6.80
0.63		 0.60a
0.97		 0.40a
0.84		 0.40a
0.84		 0.00a
0.00		 0.00a
0.00
2B Burrowing [g] Mean
±SD		 4.0
12.6		 78.9
36.3		 90.3
91.6		 121.1a
61.6		 160.3a
63.0		 174.4a
42.0
2C Body weight change [%] Mean
±SD		 −8.30
2.39		 −7.58
2.02		 −8.45
1.86		 −7.25
2.18		 −4.65a, b, c
2.76		 −3.36a, b, c
1.75
2D Nesting-score (1–6) Mean
±SD		 1.90
1.45		 5.10a
0.74		 5.30a
0.48		 5.40a
0.70		 5.00
0.67		 4.80
0.42
2E HR [bpm] Mean
±SD		 590.75
35.86		 557.82
27.89		 515.44
20.12		 509.01a
15.59		 487.45a, b
29.58		 482.45a, b
24.31
2F Act [c/min] Mean
±SD		 1.41
0.57		 2.16
0.52		 2.21
0.68		 3.30a
0.92		 3.41a
0.99		 3.87a, b, c
1.07
2G BT [°C] Mean
±SD		 36.54
0.43		 36.71
0.35		 36.56
0.37		 36.61
0.40		 36.79
0.23		 36.71
0.20
2H FCMs [ng/g] Mean
±SD		 4061.98
1560.77		 2085.26a
1311.05		 1402.17a
560.25		 1325.48a
413.48		 1301.45a
500.32		 1220.90a
576.03
a

P < 0.05 compared to day 0.

b

P < 0.05 compared to day 1.

c

P < 0.05 compared to day 2.