Table 2. The relationship between adolescent suicide rates and socioeconomic indicators.
β | Wald 95%CI | Wald χ2 (df) | p-value | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Total suicide rate, age 10-19 | ||||
GDP | 1.90 | -5.97 to 9.76 | 0.22(1) | 0.637 |
Unemployment | -0.03 | -0.19 to 0.14 | 0.12(1) | 0.733 |
Gini | 10.69 | 2.32 to 19.05 | 6.27(1) | 0.012* |
Male suicide rate, age 10-19 | ||||
GDP | 4.04 | -5.84 to 0.00 | 0.64(1) | 0.423 |
Unemployment | -0.03 | -0.21 to 0.16 | 0.07(1) | 0.788 |
Gini | 7.30 | -2.31 to 16.90 | 2.22(1) | 0.136 |
Female suicide rate, age 10-19 | ||||
GDP | -5.82 | -8.41 to -3.23 | 19.37(1) | < 0.001† |
Unemployment | 0.06 | 0.02 to 0.10 | 7.10(1) | 0.008* |
Gini | 9.99 | 8.23 to 11.75 | 122.69(1) | < 0.001† |
Total suicide rate, age 10-14 | ||||
GDP | 0.00 | 0.00 to 3.47 | 3.66(1) | 0.056 |
Unemployment | 0.12 | -0.02 to 0.26 | 2.96(1) | 0.085 |
Gini | -0.62 | -12.40 to 11.16 | 0.01(1) | 0.918 |
Total suicide rate, age 15-19 | ||||
GDP | -3.34 | 0.00 to 5.34 | 0.57(1) | 0.122 |
Unemployment | -0.02 | -0.17 to 0.13 | 0.07(1) | 0.796 |
Gini | 9.63 | 2.31 to 16.96 | 6.64(1) | 0.010* |
Male suicide rate, age 15-19 | ||||
GDP | 5.19 | -5.29 to 0.00 | 0.94(1) | 0.332 |
Unemployment | 0.01 | -0.13 to 0.15 | 0.03(1) | 0.854 |
Gini | 4.93 | -1.60 to 11.45 | 2.19(1) | 0.139 |
Female suicide rate, age 15-19 | ||||
GDP | 3.38 | -9.21 to 0.00 | 0.57(1) | 0.122 |
Unemployment | 0.02 | -0.09 to 0.12 | 0.07(1) | 0.796 |
Gini | 13.20 | 9.23 to 17.14 | 6.64(1) | 0.010* |
95%CI = 95% confidence interval; df = degrees of freedom; GDP = gross domestic product; QIC = quasi-likelihood under independence model criterion.
Generalized estimating equation model results. Seven separate models were tested. The six large cities were used as the subject variable and the year was used as the repeated measure variable. The dependent variable was modeled with gamma distribution. The structure that provided the model with the lowest QIC was selected, and this was independent structure in all models, except the suicide rate among 15- to 19-year-old females, for which the unstructured model provided the lowest QIC.
p < 0.05;
p < 0.01.