Skip to main content
. 2019 Oct 15;6(7):342–349. doi: 10.1089/lgbt.2018.0206

Table 4.

Results from Logistic Regression Examining Sexual Orientation Disparities in Adolescent Pregnancy

  Model 1 Model 2 Model 3 (n  = 8115) Model 4 (n = 8115)
OR 95% CI OR 95% CI OR 95% CI OR 95% CI
Sexual identity
 Heterosexual (reference)
 Lesbian 2.33 0.93–5.80 2.26 0.87–5.87 2.46 0.82–7.35 1.11 0.16–7.98
 Bisexual 1.65 1.12–2.43 1.72 1.15–2.58 1.64 1.02–2.64 1.98 1.15–3.39
 Not sure 1.22 0.64–2.35 1.24 0.63–2.45 0.85 0.40–1.80 0.75 0.31–1.77
Sexual behavior
 Only male (reference)
 Both male and female 1.33 0.92–1.92 1.38 0.95–2.03 1.1 0.72–1.68 1.21 0.66–2.23
Interactions
 Lesbian × male and female             2.2 0.22–22.53
 Bisexual × male and female             0.7 0.31–1.61
 Not sure × male and female             1.3 0.25–6.75
Condom use at last sex
 No (reference)
 Yes         0.38 0.28–0.51 0.38 0.28–0.52
Alcohol or other drug use at last sex
 No (reference)
 Yes         1.78 1.29–2.45 1.78 1.30–2.45
WHO Tier 1 or Tier 2 contraception use at last sex
 No (reference)
 Yes         1.27 0.88–1.85 1.29 0.88–1.87

Models 2–4 adjust for age, race/ethnicity, and school grade.

Bolded values = p < 0.05.