Table 3.

Baseline versus follow-up eccentric strength scores (in Nm/kg) (±1 SD) (95% CI) (p>0.01 for all data sets) and EHAD and EHAB strengths measured

	Baseline EHAD	Follow-up EHAD	Mean % change	Baseline EHAB	Follow-up EHAB	Mean % change	Baseline EHAD:EHAB ratio	Follow-up EHAD:EHAB ratio	Mean % change
Right leg	3.46 (±0.49) (3.21 to 3.71)	4.32 (±0.86) (3.88 to 4.76)	25% increase	3.08 (±0.55) (2.80 to 3.36)	3.5 (±0.67) (3.16 to 3.84)	13% increase	1.12 (±0.51) (0.86 to 1.38)	1.24 (±0.75) (0.85 to 1.63)	10% increase
Left leg	3.55 (±0.53) (3.28 to 3.82)	4.4 (±0.64) (4.07 to 4.73)	24% increase	3.17 (±0.43) (2.95 to 3.39)	3.5 (±0.64) (3.17 to 3.83)	10% increase	1.12 (±0.49) (0.87 to 1.37)	1.26 (±0.65) (0.93 to 1.59)	12% increase

EHAB, eccentric hip abduction; EHAD, eccentric hip adduction.