Skip to main content
. 2019 Sep 5;8(14):6176–6184. doi: 10.1002/cam4.2546

Table 2.

Studies Using Two‐Fraction SBRT for Spinal Metastases

References Patients (Lesions) Age (median) Sex (male/female) Tumor type Dose (Gy, median) Follow‐up (mo, median) Local control (1‐y) Overall survival (1‐y) MINORS
Zeng et al29 52 (93) NA 27/25 mixed 24 14.4 and 19.5a 91.3% 61.5% 22
Ito et al30 131 (134) 65 81/50 mixed 24 9 72.3% 65.0% 12
Ito et al31 28 (28) 62 18/10 mixed 24 13 70% NA 12
Tseng et al32 145 (279) 68 78/67 mixed 24 15 90.3% 73.1% 14
Chang et al33 60 (72) 66 49/11 mixed 24 21 92% 90% 12
Thibault et al34 37 (71) 63 25/12 RCC 24 12.3 83% 64% 14
Choi et al35 42 (51) 57 17/25 mixed 20 7 73% 68% 12
Tsai et al36 69 (127) 54 34/35 mixed 15.5 (mean) 10 96.8% (10‐mo) NA 11

Abbreviations: Gy: gray; mo: month; NA: not applied; RCC: renal cell carcinoma; y: year.

a

Median follow‐up for cervical cohort and sacral cohort respectively;