Table 1.
Performance comparison between SNNRice6mA and several previous methods on 6mA-Rice-Chen dataset.
| Method | Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) | Accuracy (%) | MCC | AUC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SNNRice6mA | 92.16 | 94.32 | 93.24 | 0.87 | 0.97 |
| SNNRice6mA -feature |
90.34 | 92.95 | 91.65 | 0.83 | 0.98 |
| i6mA-Pred | 82.95 | 83.30 | 83.13 | 0.66 | 0.89 |
| MM-6mAPred | 89.32 | 90.11 | 89.72 | 0.79 | / |
| iDNA6mA | 86.70 | 86.59 | 86.64 | 0.73 | 0.93 |
| SDM6A | 85.20 | 90.90 | 88.10 | 0.76 | 0.94 |
| iDNA6mA-rice | 83.86 | 83.41 | 83.63 | 0.67 | 0.91 |
6mA, N6-methyladenine; AUC, area under the curve; MCC, Matthews correlation coefficient.