Skip to main content
. 2019 Oct 17;8(5):27. doi: 10.1167/tvst.8.5.27

Table 2.

IPL and GCL Thickness Measurement for All Study Eyes and After Excluding Superpixels Where the GCL Thickness was <30 μm According to Eccentricity


All Superpixels
Superpixels With GCL thickness >30 μm
Healthy
Glaucoma
P*
Healthy
Glaucoma
P*
IPL
 All points 34.4 ± 5.9 27.6 ± 6.1 <0.001 35.0 ± 5.7 33.2 ± 5.0 0.406
 1.5° eccentricity, μm 34.1 ± 3.4 27.8 ± 5.9 <0.001 34.1 ± 3.4 34.1 ± 3.0 0.686
 4.5° eccentricity, μm 39.6 ± 4.2 31.2 ± 6.5 <0.001 39.6 ± 4.2 35.2 ± 5.1 <0.001
 7.5° eccentricity, μm 31.1 ± 4.9 25.2 ± 4.6 <0.001 31.6 ± 4.8 30.1 ± 3.6 0.465
GCL
 All points 41.3 ± 8.4 29.5 ± 10.1 <0.001 42.8 ± 7.5 39.8 ± 6.7 0.016
 1.5° eccentricity, μm 36.9 ± 4.3 26.9 ± 9.7 <0.001 38.2 ± 4.7 37.8 ± 4.6 0.380
 4.5° eccentricity, μm 49.7 ± 5.6 34.6 ± 11.4 0.013 49.8 ± 5.4 42.5 ± 7.4 <0.001
 7.5° eccentricity, μm 37.2 ± 6.3 26.8 ± 7.9 <0.001 38.9 ± 5.4 36.8 ± 4.6 0.492

The latter is presented to be consistent with multivariable analyses predicting IPL thickness in all eyes; 1445 of 3960 (36.4%) superpixels had GCL thickness <30 μm.

*

P values are based on multivariable linear mixed regression analyses entering variables with P < 0.15 in the model and accounting for the correlation of superpixels in each eye.