Table 2.

Estimated odds ratio, standard error, 95% confidence interval, and P-values for effects of spatial scale and publication year on tick-borne disease risk. There were significant effects of scale and year (Wald test statistic [df = 4] = 117.6, P < 0.0001)

Spatial scale	Odds ratio	SE	CI	P	Number of studies	Number of records
Yard	2.60	1.16	[1.96, 3.46]	<0.0001	13	59
Neighborhood	4.08	1.29	[2.49, 6.68]	<0.0001	4	5
Outside Neighborhood	2.03	1.13	[1.59, 2.59]	<0.0001	9	34
Year	0.97	1.01	[0.96, 0.99]	0.0001	NA	NA