Skip to main content
. 2010 Oct 1;36(Suppl 3):1–20. doi: 10.14745/ccdr.v36i00as3

Table 2. Possible and Reported Epidemiological Characteristics: Planning Considerations for the Potential pH1N1/09 Fall Wave, from the Public Health Agency of Canada’s Planning Considerations, September 2009.

World Health Organization’s Areas for Considerationa Selected Planning Considerations and Estimates from International Sources Canadian Areas of Consideration:
Selected Planning Considerations, Data and Estimates Relevant to the Canadian Context
United States Planning Considerationsb
(a plausible scenario for fall resurgence of 2009-H1N1)
United Kingdom Planning Considerationsc
(for the current A(H1N1) influenza pandemic)
&
U.K. Health Protection Agency Estimates
Considerations, Data, and Estimates Source of Information
Total number suspected and confirmed cases Infection of 30–50% of the U.S. population in the fall and winter (90–150 million infections)
Symptoms in 20–40% of the U.S. population (60–120 million)
4,500 new cases in the UK in the week of 24 August 2009d
Weekly number of cases at epidemic peak: 110,000e
4.5-10.6 million Canadians clinically ill, over possibly three wavesg Public Health Agency of Canada, Canadian Pandemic Influenza Plan, 2006
British Columbia: project approximately 11,000 courses of antibiotics will be requiredh Government of British Columbia, British Columbia’s H1N1 Pandemic Influenza Response Plan
Evidence of concurrent bacterial infection was found in specimens from 22 (29%) of the 77 fatal cases of confirmed 2009 pandemic influenza A (H1N1)i Northern hemisphere data on pH1N1/09 (Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report)
Total number deaths Estimated deaths: 30,000–90,000 70 deaths, cumulative as of 3 September 2009d
Estimated number of deaths for the fall wave: 20,000c
78 deaths, cumulative as of 26 September 2009j Public Health Agency of Canada, FluWatch data on pH1N1/09
Clinical attack rate Produce infection of 30–50% of the U.S. population in the fall and winter (90–150 million infections)
Symptoms in 20–40% of the U.S. population (60–120 million)
Up to 30% of populationc
Peak clinical attack rate: nationally, up to 6.5% of population per week; locally, 4.5-8.0% of population per weekc
15-35% over the course of the pandemick Public Health Agency of Canada, Canadian Pandemic Influenza Plan, 2006
20-40%l Other planning considerations on pH1N1/09 (White Paper on Novel H1N1)
Australia: 20% clinical attack rate; with no intervention, estimated by the end of the winter that 1 in 5 Australians could become infectedm Southern hemisphere data on pH1N1/09 winter wave
Case-fatality or mortality rate - Estimated case fatality rate reduced from 0.1-0.35% (first major wave)f to 0.1%c 0.4% in those who are clinically ill (for a pandemic of mild to moderate severity, and in the absence of any interventions, e.g. vaccine, antivirals)k Public Health Agency of Canada, Canadian Pandemic Influenza Plan, 2006
Comparative health care usage rates between an inter-pandemic and pandemic year: 8.2 times more deaths attributable to influenza during pandemic compared to inter-pandemic yeark Public Health Agency of Canada, Canadian Pandemic Influenza Plan, 2006
Case-fatality or mortality rate 0.1% case fatality rate for seasonal influenza (4,000 deaths attributed to influenza annually and 10% clinical attack rate), primarily among persons aged 65 years or oldern,o Canadian data on seasonal influenza
Highest pH1N1/09 confirmed mortality rate occurred in those over 65 years of age (0.42 per 100,000; spring wave, as of 22 August 2009)p Public Health Agency of Canada, FluWatch data on pH1N1/09
pH1N1/09 confirmed mortality rate 0.23 per 100,000 population in Canada, as of 31 August 2009q Public Health Agency of Canada data on pH1N1/09
Reproduction number (R0) - - 1.4—1.8 (initial wave)k Public Health Agency of Canada, Canadian Pandemic Influenza Plan, 2006
Other transmission characteristics Projected peak incidence date (unmitigated): October 15, 2009
At peak incidence, 1–2% of U.S. population infected each day, assuming no change in virus
Second wave to occur ~ mid-to-late October 2009c - -

a World Health Organization. Considerations for assessing the severity of an influenza pandemic. Weekly epidemiological record (WER). 29 May 2009;84(22):197-202. URL: www.who.int/wer. Date of access: 9 Sept. 2009.

b President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (PCAST). Report to the President on U.S. preparations for 2009-H1N1 influenza. URL: www.whitehouse.gov/assets/documents/PCAST_H1N1_Report.pdf. Date of access: Sept. 2009.

c United Kingdom Department of Health (UKDH). Swine flu: UK planning assumptions (3 September 2009). URL: http://www.businesslink.gov.uk/Horizontal_Services_files/UKplanningassumptions03092009.pdf. Date of access: 3 Sept. 2009.

d Health Protection Agency. Weekly national influenza report. 3 September 2009. URL: http://www.hpa.org.uk/web/HPAwebFile/HPAweb_C/1251473420520.

e Health Protection Agency. Weekly national influenza report. 30 July 2009. URL: http://www.hpa.org.uk/web/HPAwebFile/HPAweb_C/1248940851283.

f United Kingdom Department of Health (UKDH). Swine flu: UK planning assumptions—SUPERSEDED (16 July 2009). URL: http://www.dh.gov.uk/prod_consum_dh/groups/dh_digitalassets/documents/digitalasset/dh_102891.pdf.

g Public Health Agency of Canada. (2006). Canadian Pandemic Influenza Plan for the Health Sector, Annex P. URL: http://www.phac-aspc.gc.ca/cpip-pclcpi/ann-p-eng.php.

h Government of British Columbia. British Columbia’s H1N1 Pandemic Influenza Response Plan (2009): Antibiotics for Secondary Pneumonia in Community and Acute Care Settings. October 2, 2009.

i Bacterial Co-infections in Lung Tissue Specimens from Fatal Cases of 2009 Pandemic Influenza A (H1N1)—United States, May-August 2009. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. October 2, 2009 / 58(38);1071-10.

j Public Health Agency of Canada. FluWatch: September 20, 2009 to September 26, 2009 (Week 38). URL: http://www.phac-aspc.gc.ca/fluwatch/09-10/w38_09/index-eng.php.

k Public Health Agency of Canada. (2006). Canadian Pandemic Influenza Plan for the Health Sector. URL: http://www.phac-aspc.gc.ca/cpip-pclcpi/pdf-e/cpip-eng.pdf.

l Barry, JM. White Paper on Novel H1N1 (Prepared for the MIT Center for Engineering Systems Fundamentals). Massachusetts Institute of Technology Engineering Systems Division, Working Paper Series ESD-WP-2009-07. July 2009. URL: http://esd.mit.edu/WPS/2009/esd-wp-2009-07-072709.pdf.

m Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing. Australian Influenza Surveillance Summary Report No.14, 2009, Reporting period: 8 August 2009—14 August 2009. URL: http://www.healthemergency.gov.au/internet/healthemergency/publishing.nsf/Content/18D06BAC4644C98DCA25763E00823442/$File/ozflu-no14-2009.pdf.

n Schanzer DL, Langley JM, Tam TWS. Co-morbidities associated with Influenza-Attributed Hospital Admissions and Deaths, 1994-2000, Canada. In: Options for the Control of Influenza VI: June 17-23, 2007, Toronto, Ont., Canada, 2007.

o Schanzer DL, Tam TWS, Langley JM, Winchester BT. Influenza-attributable deaths: Canada 1990-1999. Epidemiol Infect 2007:135;1109-16. (Epub 2007 Feb 19).

p Public Health Agency of Canada. FluWatch: August 23, 2009 to August 29, 2009 (Week 34). URL: http://www.phac-aspc.gc.ca/fluwatch/08-09/w34_09/index-eng.php.

q Public Health Agency of Canada. Deaths associated with H1N1 flu virus in Canada. URL: http://www.phac-aspc.gc.ca/alert-alerte/h1n1/surveillance-archive/20090827-eng.php.