Skip to main content
. 2019 Jul 5;74(11):3135–3149. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkz256

Table 6.

Dolutegravir (DTG) plus optimized background (OB) in persons with virological failure and INSTI resistance on a raltegravir (RAL)- or elvitegravir (EVG)-containing regimen

AuthorYr Population Past ART DTG ART Subjects Weeks Percentage VF (95% CI)a
Eron13 RCT (VIKING – Cohort I) heavily treated; h/o RAL VF and resistance DTG (50 mg q24h) + OB 27 24 59.3 (38.8–77.6)
RCT (VIKING – Cohort II) heavily treated; h/o RAL VF and resistance DTG (50 mg q12h) + OB 24 24 25 (9.8–46.7)
Castagna14 RCT (VIKING 3) heavily treated; h/o RAL VF and resistance DTG (50 mg q12h) + OB 183 24 31.1 (24.5–38.4)
Akil15; Naeger16 RCT (VIKING 4; with vs without OB × 7 days) heavily treated; h/o INSTI VF and resistance DTG (50 mg q12h) + OB 30 24 53.3 (34.3–71.7)
48 60 (40.6–77.3)
Castagna18b Cohort heavily treated; h/o INSTI VF and resistance DTG (50 mg q12h) + OB 190 24 27.9 (21.6–34.8)
48 38.9 (32–46.3)
ALL, 24 weeksc 454 24 36.9 (26.9–47.0), I2 = 75
ALL, 48 weeksc 220 48 47.9 (27.5–68.3), I2 = 79

h/o, history of.

a

VF, confirmed virus load ≥50 copies/mL or treatment discontinuation for any reason. For the cohort studies, the proportion of persons with VF after the median time of follow-up was provided.

b

31% of the persons in Castagna18 had previously been enrolled in one of the VIKING trials.

c

Pooled proportions and 95% CI of VF and VF with INST resistance estimated using a random-effects meta-regression.

Note: In VIKING Cohorts I and II and in VIKING-4, subjects had a period of functional dolutegravir monotherapy lead-in of 7 (VIKING-4) to 10 (VIKING Cohorts I and II) days before the ARVs accompanying dolutegravir were optimized.