Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Oct 18.
Published in final edited form as: J Infect. 2018 May 7;77(3):227–234. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2018.03.015

Table 2.

Disposition of patients included in the mITT analysis7

Disposition Micafungin
(N=58)
Posaconazole
(N=55)
N (%) N (%)
Did not complete prophylaxis 24 (41.4) 21 (38.2)
Clinical failure 20 (34.5) 29 (52.7)
Other8 4 (6.9) 5 (9.1)
Did not complete study9 7 (12.1) 2 (3.6)
Median
(IQR)
Median (IQR)
Days on prophylaxis 16 (12-20) 13 (6-16)
N (%) N (%)
Reasons for failure
Antifungal therapy 19 (95%) 12 (41.4)
Possible IFI 6 3
Probable IFI 1 0
Persistent fever 3 3
Abnormal CT chest10 8 6
Other11 1 0
Gastrointestinal intolerance 0 13 (44.8)
TEAE 0 4 (13.8)
Death 1 (5%) 0 (0)
7

Abbreviations: mITT = modified intention-to-treat; IFI = invasive fungal infection; CT = computed tomography; TEAE = treatment-emergent adverse event.

8

These did not complete prophylaxis but did not meet criteria for clinical failure.

9

12 weeks from first dose of antifungal prophylaxis.

10

New findings on chest CT not meeting EORTC (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer) criteria for IFI.

11

Throat fungal culture with Aspergillus spp., not meeting EORTC criteria for IFI.