Skip to main content
. 2019 Sep 30;116(42):21185–21190. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1907858116

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5.

Participants read words and pseudowords, and we examined this contrast. The deep bin responded preferentially to words, whereas the middle and superficial bins responded preferentially to pseudowords (contrast effect indicated by text size within the OTS node). Connectivity was observed to be stronger during word reading between the LOTS and LMTG (indicated by arrow thickness) and related uniquely to the signal observed in the deep bin of the LOTS.