Table 1:

Correlation between perfusion and imaging measurement techniques performed in in various animal studies.

Study author	Year	2D / 3D	Validation	Modality	r
This work; Welsh et al.	2018	3D	FMS	PD-US	0.89 (GE)
					0.84 (Philips)
Lemoine et al. (26)	2011	3D	FMS	CT	0.93
Artz et al. (27)	2011	3D	FMS	MRI	0.81
Morel et al. (28)	2010	3D	US F-M	PD-US	0.81
Sridharan et al. (29)	2013	3D	FMS	US HI	0.62
Hernandez-Andrade et al. (9)	2004	2D	RMS	PD-US	0.93*
Acharya et al. (30)	2007	2D	FMS	2D Dplr US	0.76
Forsberg et al. (31)	2006	2D	FMS	US HI	0.57
Warmuth et al. (25)	2007	3D	US F-M & FMS	MRI/US	0.98

Key: MS = microspheres; FMS / RMS = fluorescent / radioactive MS; PD = power Doppler; HI = Harmonic Imaging; HI = harmonic Imaging; US = ultrasound; MRI = magnetic resonance imaging; F-M = flow-meter; CT = computed tomography;

^*= per-sheep;

GE = LOGIQ; PI = Philips EPIQ 7G