Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Oct 19.
Published in final edited form as: Am Econ J Econ Policy. 2019 Aug;11(3):197–231. doi: 10.1257/pol.20180167

Table 7.

Relationship between Medical Liability Immunity and Treatment Intensity (Relative Weighted Product, Logged), Separately for States with and without Damages Caps

(1) (2)

State-Year Cells Without Caps (Higher Liability Pressure States) State-Year Cells With Caps (Lower Liability Pressure States) All States
Active Duty Patient 0.035
(0.004)
0.035
(0.004)
0.035
(0.007)
Active Duty Patient X MTF −0.065
(0.007)
−0.044
(0.005)
−0.065
(0.011)
Active Duty Patient X MTF X Incidence of Damages Cap - - 0.021
(0.012)
N 638037 1389595 2027632

Notes: robust standard errors corrected for within-catchment-area correlation in the error term are reported in parentheses. The estimated coefficients of the caps indicator and its interaction with MTF and with the active-duty patient indicator are not shown for purposes of brevity. All regressions include year fixed effects, primary diagnosis code fixed effects, hospital fixed effects, zip-code fixed effects and controls for patient age (dummies), sex, Charlson comorbidity and paygrade (dummies). MTF and Active-Duty-Patient X MTF are instrumented by a series of dummy variables capturing different distance bins between a patient’s residence and the closest MTF along with the interaction between such dummies and the active-duty-patient dummy. The coefficient of the MTF indicator is dropped due to the inclusion of provider fixed effects.

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure