Table 1,
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | M | SD | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Overall group | |||||||
1. Age | - | 15.14 | 1.89 | ||||
2. Gender nonconformitya | .22*** | - | 1.73e | 0.72 | |||
3. Same-sex attractionb | .07** | .22*** | - | 1.19 | 0.65 | ||
4. Homophobic name-callingc | −.14*** | .17*** | .16*** | - | 1.39e | 0.65 | |
5. General peer victimizationd | −.10*** | .31*** | .18*** | .31*** | - | 1.59e | 0.57 |
Boys | |||||||
1. Age | - | 15.12 | 1.92 | ||||
2. Gender nonconformity | .24*** | - | 1.66 | 0.66 | |||
3. Same-sex attraction | .09** | .31*** | - | 1.17 | 0.63 | ||
4. Homophobic name-calling | −.19*** | .21*** | .16*** | - | 1.58 | 0.75 | |
5. General peer victimization | −.13*** | .35*** | .18*** | .35*** | - | 1.64 | 0.58 |
Girls | |||||||
1. Age | - | 15.15 | 1.87 | ||||
2. Gender nonconformity | .21*** | - | 1.80 | 0.77 | |||
3. Same-sex attraction | .05 | .16*** | - | 1.21 | 0.67 | ||
4. Homophobic name-calling | −.09** | .22*** | .22*** | - | 1.22 | 0.49 | |
5. General peer victimization | −.08* | .31*** | .19*** | .24*** | - | 1.54 | 0.55 |
Gender nonconformity: 1 = low, 7 = high;
Same-sex attraction: 1 = low, 5 = high;
Homophobic name-calling: 1 = low, 5 = high;
General peer victimization: 1 = low, 5 = high.
ANOVA showed a significant difference between boys and girls.
p < .05,
p < .01,
p < .001