Table 3.

Means [between-subjects 95% CIs] of recognition performance measures by retrieval condition, Experiment 1

Condition	N	Deep proportion hit	Shallow proportion hit	Proportion false alarms	d′	c
RKfG	112	.84 [.81, .87]	.56 [.52, .60]	.13 [.11, .15]	1.78 [1.66, 1.90]	0.31 [0.23, 0.39]
RKFG	105	.85 [.82, .88]	.54 [.50, .58]	.14 [.12, .16]	1.76 [1.63, 1.88]	0.33 [0.25, 0.41]
RKG	106	.85 [.82, .88]	.55 [.51, .59]	.13 [.11, .15]	1.77 [1.65, 1.90]	0.32 [0.24, 0.40]
RFG	112	.85 [.82, .88]	.56 [.52, .60]	.15 [.13, .17]	1.74 [1.61, 1.86]	0.27 [0.20, 0.35]