Skip to main content
. 2019 Feb 1;27(11):3400–3410. doi: 10.1007/s00167-019-05366-w

Table 3.

Adjusted multiple linear regression analysis for the femoral tunnel angle

One-leg-hop test, mean (SD) IKDC 2000, total score (SD) KT-1000 MMT side-to-side difference (SD) Pivot shift dichotomized (0 vs. 1+, 2+, 3+), n (%) of events Lachman test dichotomized (0 vs. 1+, 2+, 3+), n (%) of events Kellgren–Lawrence dichotomized (0–1 vs. 2–4), n (%) of events
FTA, value intervals − 28–< 6 88 (15.6) 69 (19.1) 2.2 (3.0) 9 (30%) 18 (58%) 15 (48%)
6–< 12.6 94 (18.6) 77 (15.9) 2.2 (2.9) 7 (23%) 14 (47%) 13 (43%)
12.6–38.8 93 (22.3) 71 (24.8) 1.1 (3.1) 15 (50%) 15 (50%) 11 (37%)
FTA, beta (95% CI) − 0.23 (− 0.71;0.24) − 0.35 (− 0.81;0.12) − 0.04 (− 0.11;0.03) Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable
FTA, OR (95% CI) Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable 1.05 (0.99–1.11) 1.0 (0.95–1.05) 1.01 (0.96–1.07)
FTA, p-value n.s n.s n.s n.s n.s n.s
Missing patientsa 10 10 10 10 10 10

Multivariate analysis adjusted for the type of graft, surgical portal, associated injuries and age at operation. For the dichotomized variables, the number of events and the percentage of the total number of patients in that particular value interval are presented

SD Standard deviation, IKDC International Knee Documentation Committee, MMT manual maximum test, FTA femoral tunnel angle, CI confidence interval, OR odds ratio, Ns not significant

aMissing patients are patients with incomplete data for the particular analysis, details regarding this can be found in the results section