Skip to main content
. 2019 Feb 1;27(11):3400–3410. doi: 10.1007/s00167-019-05366-w

Table 4.

Adjusted linear regression analysis for the femoral tunnel position in the coronal plane

One-leg-hop test, mean (SD) IKDC 2000, total score (SD) KT-1000 MMT side-to-side difference (SD) Pivot shift dichotomized (0 vs. 1+, 2+, 3+), n (%) of events Lachman test dichotomized (0 vs. 1+, 2+, 3+), n (%) of events Kellgren–Lawrence dichotomized (0–1 vs. 2–4), n (%) of events
FTP coronal, value intervals 31.2–< 41.5 95 (26.5) 72 (20.3) 1.9 (2.8) 9 (27%) 16 (49%) 11 (33%)
41.5 < 44.9 93 (15.0) 74 (19.1) 1.9 (2.6) 15 (46%) 18 (53%) 15 (44%)
44.9–48.9 87 (14.4) 69 (23.1) 1.5 (3.5) 11 (33%) 18 (55%) 17 (52%)
FTP coronal, beta (95% CI) − 0.88 (− 2.10;0.34) 0.70 (− 0.43;1.84) − 0.01 (− 0.18;0.17) Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable
FTP coronal, OR (95% CI) Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable 1.04 (0.92–1.18) 1.01 (0.90–1.14) 0.95 (0.83–1.08)
FTP coronal, p-value N.s N.s N.s N.s N.s N.s
Missing patientsa 1 1 1 1 1 1

Multivariate analysis adjusted for the type of graft, surgical portal, associated injuries and age at operation. For the dichotomized variables, the number of events and the percentage of the total number of patients in that particular value interval are presented

SD Standard deviation, IKDC International Knee Documentation Committee, MMT manual maximum test, FTA femoral tunnel angle, CI confidence interval, OR odds ratio, Ns not significant

aMissing patients are patients with incomplete data for the particular analysis, details regarding this can be found in the results section