Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Apr 15.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Cancer Res. 2019 Aug 1;25(20):6080–6088. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-19-1135

Table 3.

Treatment comparison on PFS and OS, in subgroup analysis by PD-L1 expression on tumor cells (≥1% cutoff)

METEOR (N=306) CABOSUN (N=110)
CABOZANTINIB
(C)
EVEROLIMUS
(E)
C vs E CABOZANTINIB
(C)
SUNITINIB
(S)
C vs S
N Median
months
(95%CI)
N Median
months
(95%CI)
Hazard ratio
(95%CI)
N Median
months
(95%CI)
N Median
months
(95%CI)
Hazard
ratio
(95%CI)
PFS
PD-L1(−) 112 8.5
(7.2-13.5)
106 4.1
(3.7-6)
0.46
(0.32-0.66)
52 11.0
(6.8-15.6)
33 5.0
(3-12.9)
0.47
(0.26-0.86)
PD-L1(+) 38 5.6
(4.5-7.4)
50 3.7
(2-5.3)
0.66
(0.40-1.11)
9 8.4
(1.1-16.6)
16 3.1
(1.6-10.1)
0.46
(0.18-1.21)
P-interaction 0.217 0.998
OS
PD-L1(−) 112 NR 106 18.4
(15.1-NR)
0.58
(0.38-0.88)
52 30.3
(18.8-NR)
33 22.4
(7.6-NR)
0.71
(0.39-1.29)
PD-L1(+) 38 18.4
(10.4-22)
50 13.9
(8.7-18.9)
0.82
(0.47-1.41)
9 18.1
(1.1-35)
16 21.0
(6.4-30.8)
0.85
(0.31-2.31)
P-interaction 0.359 0.372

PFS: Progression free survival; OS: Overall survival