Skip to main content
. 2019 Sep 13;6(10):1989–1995. doi: 10.1002/acn3.50889

Table 2.

UPDRS III–IV scores pre‐ and post‐DBS. Lead location and factors precluding further DBS surgeries.

Patient UPDRS‐III scores pre‐DBS OFF‐medications UPDRS‐III scores post‐DBS, ON‐Stimulation and OFF‐ medications OFF‐time (scale) prior to DBS OFF‐time (scale) after DBS Dyskinesias duration(scale) prior to DBS Dyskinesias duration(scale) after DBS Lead location, comments, and factors precluding further DBS surgeries
1 25 18 N/A N/A N/A N/A Bilateral STN. Suboptimally placed leads. Cognitive decline contraindicated further DBS surgeries
2 28 19 2 1 2 0 Right GPI. Well placed lead. Cognitive decline contraindicated further DBS surgeries
3 31/34(Left DBS/Right DBS) 28/23(Left DBS/Right DBS) N/A left 1(Right) N/A left 1(Right) N/A left 1(Right) N/A left 1(Right) Bilateral GPI. Well placed leads. Gastroparesis and unpredictable response to oral medications necessitated LCIG therapy
4 33 26 3 2 3 1 Bilateral STN. Suboptimally placed leads. Elected to pursue LCIG therapy rather than revision DBS surgery
5 29 22 1 1 4 2 Bilateral STN. Suboptimally placed DBS leads. Severe fluctuations and unpredictable response to oral levodopa necessitated LCIG therapy
6 36 23 2 1 1 0 Left GPI. Well placed lead. Developed SDH after the first DBS surgery and elected not to have further DBS surgeries

The off‐time/dyskinesia duration scale 1: 25% or less, 2: 25–50%, 3: 51–75%, 4: 76–100% of waking hours. N/A missing data. Patient 3 had two DBS surgeries 4 years apart.