Skip to main content
. 2019 Oct 20;22(10):e25388. doi: 10.1002/jia2.25388

Table 3.

Comparison of the number of HIV‐positive pregnant women and HEI receiving PMTCT and EID services in 15 ODs before and after implementation of IACM

Identified HIV ‐positive PW HIV‐positive PW receiving ART/ARV proph (%) HEI born HEI received ARV (%) HEI received Cotrim (%) HEI received DNA‐PCR test (%) DNA‐PCR positive result (%)
Before IACM Approach 2011 to 2013 1273 921 (72.3) 995 952 (95.7) 414 (41.6)a 410 (41.2)a 10 (2.4)
After IACM Approach 2014 to 2016 938 867 (92.4) 533 456 (85.6) 390 (73.2)a 396 (74.3)a 7 (1.8)
p‐valueb < 0001 < 0001 < 0001 < 0001 = 0.5073

ART, antiretroviral therapy; ARV proph, antiretroviral prophylaxis; HEI, HIV exposed infants; PW, pregnant women.

aCalculated using HEI born as denominator (as only data available for both period before and after IACM approach); bchi square test was used.