Table 3.
Studies showing the use of condom balloon tamponade during last 10 years
| Author/country | Setting | Year | Method | No of cases | Success of tamponade | % of success |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Bagga et al. [17] India |
PGI Chandigarh |
2007 | Condom catheter | 2 | 2 of 2 | 100 |
|
Sheikh et al. [21] Pakistan |
Aga Khan University Karachi | 2008 | Undefined condom catheter | 15 | 15 of 15 | 100 |
|
Nahar et al. [18] Bangladesh |
Rajshahi Med. College Hospital | 2009 | Condom catheter | 53 | 52 of 53 (one c/o eclampsia died of DIC) | 98.11 |
|
Thapa et al. [11] Nepal |
P. Women’s Hospital, Thapathali | 2010 | Condom catheter | 14 | 14 of 14 | 100 |
|
Rather et al. [14] India |
Med. College Hospital Srinagar | 2010 | Condom catheter (red rubber) | 26 | 25 of 26 (one required Hysterectomy) | 96.2 |
|
Manaktala [19] India |
Lok Nayak Hospital | 2011 | Condom catheter | 2 | 2 of 2 | 100 |
|
Rathore [20] India |
Teaching Hospital | 2012 | Condom catheter | 18 | 17 of 18 | 94 |
|
Tort et al. [22] Benin, France |
(Feasibility study for RCT) | 2013 | Condom catheter + misoprostol | 5 | 5 of 5 (exact outcome NA) | 100 |
|
Ranatunga [6] Shri Lanka |
Castle Street Hosp, Colombo | 2013 | Condom catheter | 42 | 40 of 42 (two needed hysterectomy) | 95.2 |
|
Maya et al. [24] Africa |
College of Health S, Ghana | 2015 | Condom catheter (cervical suture/to prevent expulsion) | 3 | 3 of 3 | 100 |
|
Hasabe et al. [23] India |
NIMS Med College, Jaipur | 2016 | Condom catheter | 36 | 34 of 36 (B-Lynch in one and hysterectomy in another needed) | 94.44 |
|
Present study India |
Pt JNMMC, Raipur, CG | CGB and conventional C-UBT | 60 | 59 of 60 (one case died of DIC) | 98.33 | |
| Total | 12 | 277 | 268 | 96.75 |