Table 3.
Compound | No. | RIa | m/z b | Quantification (μg/100 g dry weight) | Ratio steamed/ordinary | Ordinary cooked ricec (μg/100 g) | Odor threshold (μg/100 g) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Raw barley | Ordinary cooked barley | Steamed barley | |||||||
Hexanal | [2] | 1079 | 44 | 643 ± 63 | 112 ± 46 | 88 ± 25 | 0.8 | 14.5 | 0.91d |
2-Pentylfuran | [4] | 1231 | 81 | 15 ± 0.7 | 27 ± 3.5 | 26 ± 6.7 | 1.0 | 0.4 | 0.04e |
1-Hexanol | [7] | 1357 | 56 | 15 ± 0.9 | 4 ± 1.1 | 2 ± 0.5** | 0.4 | 10.3 | 800d |
Nonanal | [8] | 1394 | 70 | 10 ± 1.3 | 4 ± 1.0 | 3 ± 0.7 | 0.8 | 6.6 | 0.08e |
(E)-2-Octenal | [10] | 1430 | 70 | 10 ± 0.5 | 6 ± 1.0 | 4 ± 0.8* | 0.7 | N.D.f | 0.3e |
Acetic acid | [12] | 1454 | 60 | 633 ± 48 | 933 ± 85 | 251 ± 48** | 0.3 | 102.4 | 20,000d |
Benzaldehyde | [14] | 1523 | 106 | 7 ± 0.6 | 3 ± 0.4 | 2 ± 0.3* | 0.8 | 1.8 | 90d |
(E)-2-Nonenal | [15] | 1537 | 70 | 6 ± 1.5 | 3.3 ± 0.8 | 2.7 ± 0.6 | 0.8 | N.D. | 0.007e |
3-Methylbutyric acid | [26] | 1685 | 60 | 19 ± 4.1 | 32 ± 3.3 | 7 ± 1.1** | 0.2 | 5.0 | 3.34d |
(E,E)-2,4-Nonadienal | [28] | 1704 | 81 | 3.8 ± 1.0 | 4 ± 0.4 | 3 ± 0.4* | 0.8 | N.D. | – |
Pentanoic acid | [31] | 1751 | 60 | 117 ± 31 | 127 ± 46 | 51 ± 12.7* | 0.4 | 15.0 | 300d |
(E,Z)-2,4-Decadienalg | [32] | 1768 | 81 | Trh | 2 ± 0.3 | 1 ± 0.5 | 0.8 | N.D. | – |
(E,E)-2,4-Decadienal | [33] | 1815 | 81 | 0.6 ± 0.4 | 26 ± 4.8 | 21 ± 4.5 | 0.8 | 0.6 | 0.006e |
Hexanoic acid | [35] | 1852 | 60 | 261 ± 113 | 294 ± 114 | 149 ± 47* | 0.5 | 118.1 | 42d |
All the compounds except (E,Z)-2,4-decadienal were identified by mass spectrometry and retention times with those of authentic compounds. Mass spectra agreed with those in the NIST 08 mass library. Retention indexes (RI) agree with the literature (Chen et al. 2013; Zeng et al. 2009). Water contents of raw barley, ordinary cooked barley, and steamed barley were 13.1%, 65.3%, and 62.8%, respectively
The asterisk shows the significance of the difference between ordinary cooked barley and steamed barley with the Welch’s t test (**p < 0.01, *p < 0.05)
aExperimental retention indices calculated on a DB-WAX column
bm/z was used for the area measurement; m/z = 57 was used for the internal standard (cyclohexanol) area measurement
cData from Takemitsu et al. (2016)
Odor thresholds from dChen et al. (2013), eButtery et al. (1988). Quantification data are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 4–5)
fNot detected
g(E,Z)-2,4-decadienal was quantified based on the response factor of (E,E)-2,4-decadienal
hTrace level