Skip to main content
. 2019 Oct 3;20(19):4917. doi: 10.3390/ijms20194917

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Antitumor effect of ZA (red) compared to BPH (blue) on the M24met cell line in SCID female mice. (A) Results after 23 day-long treatment with 1.47-µmol/kg ZA or BPH showed that BPH was significantly more effective at inhibiting tumor growth than ZA. (B). BPH slightly decreased the tumor mass; however, it was not statistically significant. Data are shown as the average ± SEM from n = 10 groups. Asterisks mean a significant difference between BPH and ZA by * p < 0.05.