Skip to main content
. 2019 Sep 26;16(19):3616. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16193616

Table 3.

The respondents’ cognition of lean meat essence, animal welfare, and traceability.

Characteristics Items Number of Samples Percent (%)
The incident of lean meat essence (known or not) Yes 268 84.81
No 48 15.19
Necessity of a lean meat essence test on pork Very necessary 157 49.68
Necessary 122 38.61
Dispensable 23 7.28
Not necessary 11 3.48
Not necessary at all 3 0.95
Levels of the understanding of the pork traceability system Excellent 2 0.63
Good 37 11.71
Average 84 26.58
Below average 146 46.20
No understanding 47 14.88
Potential of the pork traceability system to decrease the risk of pork safety Definitely 25 7.91
Possibly 171 54.11
Not sure 100 31.65
Not significantly 15 4.75
Not at all 5 1.58
Levels of understanding of animal welfare Excellent 5 1.58
Good 26 8.23
Average 74 23.42
Below average 164 51.90
No understanding 47 14.87
Influence of the promotion of animal welfare on pork quality and safety Extremely helpful 36 11.39
Helpful to some extent 216 68.35
Not sure 55 17.41
Not helpful 8 2.53
Useless 1 0.32