Skip to main content
. 2019 Oct 4;16(19):3748. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16193748

Table 5.

Full details on binomial logistic regression.

B SE Wald df p OR 95% CI for OR
Lower Upper
Gender (Male) 0.69 0.12 32.92 1.00 0.000 * 2.00 1.58 2.54
SIMD (least deprived) 0.58 0.21 7.96 1.00 0.005 * 1.79 1.20 2.69
SIMD (4) 0.66 0.20 10.88 1.00 0.001 * 1.94 1.31 2.88
SIMD (3) 0.29 0.20 2.17 1.00 0.140 1.33 0.91 1.96
SIMD (2) 0.54 0.20 7.14 1.00 0.008 * 1.72 1.15 2.55
SIMD (most deprived as reference) 14.35 4.00 0.006 *
Age −0.09 0.01 72.12 1.00 0.000 * 0.92 0.90 0.94
Smoking status (never smoker) 0.80 0.21 14.65 1.00 0.000 * 2.22 1.48 3.34
Smoking status (ex-regular smoker) 0.54 0.21 6.95 1.00 0.008 * 1.72 1.15 2.59
Smoking status (current smoker as reference) 15.30 2.00 0.000 *
Total portion of fruit and vegetables 0.17 0.03 35.81 1.00 0.000 * 1.19 1.12 1.25
BMI -0.07 0.01 34.80 1.00 0.000 * 0.93 0.91 0.95
WEMWBS score 0.05 0.01 38.09 1.00 0.000 * 1.05 1.03 1.06
Constant 3.79 0.94 16.36 1.00 0.000 * 44.10

B = unstandardised regression coefficient; BMI, body mass index; CI = Confidence Interval for odds ratio; df, degrees of freedom; OR, odds ratio. S.E.; standard error of the coefficient; SIMD, Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation; WEMWBS, Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale; * p ≤ 0.05.