Skip to main content
. 2019 Sep 27;16(19):3626. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16193626

Table 2.

Diagnostic accuracy based on the area under the curve (AUC) values with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS), Programme of Research to Integrate Services for the Maintenance of Autonomy 7 (PRISMA-7) tool, and the Identification of Seniors at Risk (ISAR) tool for separating frail and non-frail based on (1) the comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA), (2) FRAIL scale, and (3) Groningen Frailty Indicator (GFI) frailty classification approaches.

Frailty Classification Approach CGA
AUC (with 95% CI)
FRAIL Scale
AUC (with 95% CI)
GFI
AUC (with 95% CI)
Instrument
CFS 0.83 (0.77–0.88) 0.68 (0.61–0.76) 0.81 (0.75–0.86)
PRISMA-7 0.88 (0.83–0.93) 0.79 (0.74–0.85) 0.82 (0.77–0.87)
ISAR 0.78 (0.71–0.84) 0.74 (0.67–0.80) 0.77 (0.71–0.82)