Skip to main content
. 2019 Oct 18;9:14990. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-50677-0

Table 2.

Correlations among RADPAI, Age, Visual Acuity and Visual Field Measurements.

RADPAI Letters Sentences Walking Going Out Dining Dressing Miscellaneous For all tasks
Age NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS
BCVA in better eyea −0.385 −0.403 −0.269 −0.274 −0.246 NS −0.377 −0.349
BCVA in worse eyeb NS −0.390 −0.259 −0.282 −0.300 NS −0.307 −0.304
10-2 IVF (quadrant subfield)
Outer Upper right NS NS 0.322 NS NS NS 0.256 0.306
Inner Upper right 0.303 0.298 0.307 NS NS NS NS 0.311
Outer Upper left NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS
Inner Upper left NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS
Outer Lower left 0.331 0.357 0.360 0.310 0.359 NS 0.401 0.414
Inner Lower left 0.353 0.381 0.356 0.352 0.358 NS 0.361 0.415
Outer Lower right 0.340 0.397 0.394 0.334 0.415 NS 0.387 0.440
Inner Lower right 0.353 0.460 0.372 0.389 0.464 NS 0.396 0.449
24-2 IVF (hemifield)
Upper NS NS 0.299 NS NS NS NS 0.265
Lower 0.336 0.346 0.425 0.322 0.371 NS 0.383 0.458

Spearman correlation coefficients between Rasch analysis-derived personal disability index (RADPAI) values, and age and visual acuities (VAs) and mean Total Deviations (TDs) of subfields in the binocular integrated visual field (IVFs) from 10-2 and 24-2.

aBCVA in better eye, best-corrected visual acuity in log MAR in better-VA eye.

bBCVA in worse eye, best-corrected visual acuity in log MAR in worse-VA eye.

NS indicates no significant correlation after Bonferroni’s correction (P > 0.05/104 = 0.00048).