Skip to main content
. 2019 Oct 16;4(12):1221–1229. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2019.3909

Table 1. Adjusted Weight, Blood Pressure, and Cardiovascular Structural and Functional Measurements Throughout Collegiate US Football Participation.

Characteristic Mean (SE) P Valuea End of Year 3, Mean (SE) P Valueb
Baseline (N = 126) End of Year 1 End of Year 2
Anthropometric measures
Weight, kg 101.1 (1.0) 102.1 (1.0) 103.7 (1.0) <.001 105.8 (1.1) <.001
BMI 29.3 (0.3) 29.6 (0.3) 30.1 (0.3) <.001 30.4 (0.3) <.001
Blood pressure
Systolic blood pressure, mm Hg 129.2 (1.1) 131.7 (1.1) 133.2 (1.1) .001 140.8 (1.6) <.001
Diastolic blood pressure, mm Hg 76.4 (0.8) 75.2 (0.8) 75.6 (0.9) .52 75.4 (1.2) .50
Heart rate, bpm 75.9 (1.1) 74.4 (1.1) 75.1 (1.1) .54 76 (1.6) .97
Cardiac structure and function
Mean LV wall thickness, mm 8.9 (0.1) 9.9 (0.1) 10.3 (0.1) <.001 12.3 (0.2) <.001
LV internal diameter end-diastole/body surface area, mm/m2 23.2 (0.2) 23.5 (0.2) 23.4 (0.2) .06 23.7 (0.2) .004
LV internal diameter end systole/body surface area, mm/m2 14.9 (0.2) 15.2 (0.2) 15.2 (0.2) .08 15.5 (0.2) .02
LV mass/body surface area, gm/m2 92.8 (1.1) 101.4 (1.1) 104.5 (1.0 <.001 108.9 (1.5) <.001
Relative wall thickness 0.35 (0.0) 0.38 (0.0) 0.39 (0.0) <.001 0.39 (0.0) <.001
Ejection fraction, % 61.5 (0.4) 60.6 (0.4) 60.8 (0.4) .18 58.6 (0.7) <.001
Global longitudinal strain, % 19.3 (0.2) 19.1 (0.2) 18.6 (0.2) .005 18.4 (0.3) .005
Diastolic function measurements
E wave velocity, cm/s 84.5 (1.3) 82.2 (1.3) 78.1(1.3) <.001 75.5 (1.8) <.001
A wave velocity, cm/s 46.1 (0.9) 42.5 (0.9) 44.1 (0.9) .07 41.4 (1.4) .002
E wave velocity–A wave velocity ratio 1.93 (0.0) 2.0 (0.0) 1.9 (0.0) .29 1.9 (0.1) .98
Tissue-Doppler LV mean E′, cm/s 15.8 (0.2) 14.9 (0.2) 14.6 (0.2) <.001 14.1 (0.3) <.001
Arterial function
Pulse-wave velocity (m/s) 5.1 (0.1) 5.3 (0.1) 5.5 (0.1) <.001 5.3 (0.1) .007

Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index (calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared); bpm, beats per minute; LV, left ventricular.

a

Linear mixed model comparison of end of year 2 with baseline value adjusted for height, player position, and race.

b

Linear mixed model comparison of end of year 3 with baseline value adjusted for height, player position, and race; 55 US football athletes were analyzed at the end of year 3.