Skip to main content
. 2014 Apr 2;34(14):4766–4775. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2828-13.2014

Table 2.

RSA results showing unique effect for each theoretical model RDM

Regions Cluster extent Voxel-level p(FDR) Pseudo-t x y z
EVC model
    L mid occip, R calcarine 2139 0.0001 8.55 −21 −91 14
Semantic features
    R PRc 128 0.0150 4.76 27 −4 −28
    R calcarine 78 0.0290 4.44 15 −94 2
    L lingual 25 0.0166 4.12 −24 −82 −12
    L PRc 43 0.0248 3.63 −33 −7 −35
Category
    L IT 619 0.0024 7.10 −51 −67 −5
    L/R calcarine 359 0.0077 4.27 15 −91 −1
    R precuneus 23 0.0077 3.75 12 −52 14
    L supramarginal 41 0.0107 3.59 −63 −25 32
Animal-plant-nonbiological
    L IT, lingual, mid occip 736 0.0069 5.71 −48 −64 −5
    L sup occipital 135 0.0069 5.15 −21 −70 32
    R lingual 124 0.0069 4.59 21 −61 −9
    R mid occipital 81 0.0126 3.28 30 −82 29
Animals
    R mid temporal, fusiform 561 0.0002 7.89 51 −73 −1
    R calcarine 121 0.0002 6.24 21 −97 2
    L mid temporal, mid occip, lingual 324 0.0002 5.54 −54 −64 21

MNI coordinates and significance levels shown for the peak voxel in each cluster. Anatomical labels are provided for up to three peak locations in each cluster. Effects in clusters smaller than 20 voxels not shown. mid, Middle; occip, occipital; PRc, perirhinal cortex; IT, inferior temporal; sup, superior.