Skip to main content
. 2019 Jul 10;62(8):2584–2600. doi: 10.1044/2019_JSLHR-S-18-0126

Table 5.

Rlaw contrasts: pairwise comparisons of marginal linear predictions (women only).

Reference condition Comparison condition exp(b) Comp/Ref SE p 95% Confidence interval
Norm_Rest Norm_Low 1.01 0.11 .951 [0.82, 1.24]
Norm_High 0.95 0.10 .656 [0.78, 1.16]
Loud_Rest 1.53 0.19 .001 [1.19, 1.95]
Loud_Low 1.26 0.19 .131 [0.93, 1.70]
Loud_High 1.12 0.17 .457 [0.83, 1.50]
Norm_Low Norm_High 0.95 0.06 .417 [0.84, 1.07]
Loud_Rest 1.52 0.10 < .001 [1.33, 1.73]
Loud_Low 1.25 0.11 .010 [1.05, 1.49]
Loud_High 1.11 0.10 .242 [0.93, 1.32]
Norm_High Loud_Rest 1.60 0.14 < .001 [1.34, 1.90]
Loud_Low 1.32 0.15 .014 [1.06, 1.64]
Loud_High 1.17 0.13 .148 [0.94, 1.45]
Loud_Rest Loud_Low 0.83 0.04 < .001 [0.74, 0.92]
Loud_High 0.73 0.05 < .001 [0.64, 0.84]
Loud_Low Loud_High 0.89 0.05 .046 [0.79, 1.00]

Note. Bolded p values (e.g., < .001) represent statistically significant results. Rlaw = laryngeal airway resistance.