Skip to main content
. 2019 Aug 7;62(8):2723–2749. doi: 10.1044/2018_JSLHR-L-18-0144

Table B2.

Results of paired permutation tests comparing outcome measures and standardized tests at each time point relative to pre-treatment and post-treatment for Lexical Retrieval Training Protocol 2.

Pre-treatment performance vs.
Post-treatment performance vs.
Post-treatment 3-month follow-up 6-month follow-up 12-month follow-up 3-month follow-up 6-month follow-up 12-month follow-up
Trained n 8 8 7 8 8 7 8
t −8.1 −6.3 −17.6 −4.6 2.0 1.2 3.3
p 0.004* 0.004* 0.008* 0.008* 0.047 1.00 0.047
Untrained n 8 8 7 8 8 7 8
t −3.5 −3.3 −3.0 −1.3 0.8 1.1 3.1
p 0.016 0.008* 0.016 0.672 0.508 0.344 0.023
BNT n 8 7 6 6 8 6 7
t −0.4 0.4 1.6 3.3 0.7 2.1 2.4
p 0.172 0.344 0.688 0.188 0.672 0.688 0.344
WAB n 8 8 7 7 8 7 7
t −1.6 1.0 1.0 4.1 2.9 1.9 4.2
p 0.172 0.672 0.344 0.031 0.172 0.344 0.031

Note. One-tailed tests were used for trained items for all comparisons to pre-treatment performance. All other comparisons utilized two-tailed tests. Trained = trained items; Untrained = untrained items; BNT = Boston Naming Test; WAB = Western Aphasia Battery.

*

Bonferroni-corrected thresholds for significance: p < 0.013 for comparisons to pre-treatment performance and p < 0.017 for comparisons to post-treatment performance.