Skip to main content
. 2019 Aug 7;62(8):2723–2749. doi: 10.1044/2018_JSLHR-L-18-0144

Table 7.

Results of permutation tests comparing change scores between the semantic (n = 9) and logopenic (n = 9) variants of primary progressive aphasia.

pre-treatment performance vs.
post-treatment performance vs.
post-treatment 3-month follow-up 6-month follow-up 12-month follow-up 3-month follow-up 6-month follow-up 12-month follow-up
Trained n 18 16 16 17 16 16 17
t −0.2 0.0 1.1 1.2 0.1 −0.2 1.8
p 0.952 0.959 0.291 0.238 0.956 0.916 0.122
Untrained n 18 16 16 17 16 16 17
t 0.4 0.6 1.3 1.9 0.4 0.6 1.0
p 0.773 0.636 0.179 0.088 0.787 0.603 0.378
BNT n 16 14 13 13 14 12 12
t −1.1 −1.0 −1.6 0.9 −0.5 −1.2 1.0
p 0.350 0.495 0.175 0.502 0.691 0.317 0.369
WAB n 18 16 16 15 16 16 15
t −1.1 0.5 1.8 1.4 2.0 2.3 1.9
p 0.280 0.694 0.120 0.162 0.070 0.035 0.077

Note. All comparisons utilized two-tailed tests for independent data sets. Bonferroni-corrected thresholds for significance: p < 0.013 for comparisons to pre-treatment performance and p < 0.017 for comparisons to post-treatment performance. Trained = trained items; Untrained = untrained items; BNT= Boston Naming Test; WAB = Western Aphasia Battery.