Skip to main content
. 2019 Aug 7;62(8):2723–2749. doi: 10.1044/2018_JSLHR-L-18-0144

Table B1.

Results of paired permutation tests comparing outcome measures and standardized tests at each time point relative to pre-treatment and post-treatment for Lexical Retrieval Training Protocol 1.

Pre-treatment performance vs.
Post-treatment performance vs.
Post-treatment 3-month follow-up 6-month follow-up 12-month follow-up 3-month follow-up 6-month follow-up 12-month follow-up
Trained n 10 8 9 9 8 9 9
t −28.1 −12.1 −17.7 −7.7 1.7 1.8 2.0
p < 0.001* 0.004* 0.002* 0.002* 0.672 1.000 1.000
Untrained n 10 8 9 9 8 9 9
t −1.2 −1.8 −1.1 −0.6 −0.5 −0.1 0.3
p 0.184 0.047 0.086 0.359 0.750 1.000 0.875
BNT n 10 8 8 8 8 8 8
t −2.4 0.7 1.7 2.0 1.3 4.0 2.7
p 0.012* 0.672 0.172 0.672 0.672 0.047 0.172
WAB n 10 8 9 8 8 9 8
t 1.6 2.5 3.6 3.4 2.3 3.5 3.5
p 0.184 0.047 0.023 0.016 0.172 0.023 0.016*

Note. One-tailed tests were used for trained items for all comparisons to pre-treatment performance. All other comparisons utilized two-tailed tests. Trained = trained items; Untrained = untrained items; BNT = Boston Naming Test; WAB = Western Aphasia Battery.

*

Bonferroni-corrected thresholds for significance: p < 0.013 for comparisons to pre-treatment performance and p < 0.017 for comparisons to post-treatment performance.