Table 2.
Summary of correlations between mean direct magnitude estimation informativeness ratings and the linguistic variables for the Comprehensive Aphasia Test (CAT) and Tree pictures.
| Linguistic measure | CAT picture |
Tree picture |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| r (strength) | p (significance) | r (strength) | p (significance) | |
| NCIU | .879 (very strong) | < .000* | .902 (very strong) | < .000* |
| %CIU | .695 (strong) | .001* | .652 (strong) | .002* |
| NP | .632 (strong) | .003* | .634 (strong) | .003* |
| PID | .217 (weak) | .357 | −.068 (weak) | .777 |
| MLU-w | .765 (strong) | < .000* | .651 (strong) | .002* |
Note. The strength of correlation was defined as in Evans (1996). NCIU = number of correct information units; %CIU = percentage of correct information units; NP = number of propositions; PID = propositional idea density; MLU-w = mean length of utterance in words.
p < .01 (significant at Bonferroni-corrected levels for multiple comparisons for each picture).