Skip to main content
. 2019 Oct 3;6(2):e001082. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2019-001082

Table 2.

Reasons for planned omission/performance of BAV*

n/N (%)
Reasons given for BAV omission (n=146)
 Desire to shorten procedural duration 109/146 (74.7)
 Cost reduction 1/145 (0.7)
 Avoidance of rapid pacing 16/145 (11.0)
 Perceived risk of annulus rupture 35/146 (24.0)
 Perceived risk of cerebral microemboli 93/145 (64.1)
 Risk of AV block 32/145 (22.1)
 Other reason 7/145 (4.8)
Reasons given for BAV performance (n=50)
 Rehearsal before final positioning/release 0/50 (0)
 Assistance in choice of valve size 13/50 (26.0)
 Stretching of the aortic wall to crack calcifications 5/50 (10.0)
 Assistance in crossing the aortic valve 31/50 (62.0)
 Reduction of PVL 2/50 (4.0)
 Reduction of radial force needed for valve expansion 0/50 (0)
 Other reason 0/50 (0)

*More than one reason may apply per patient.

AV, atrioventricular;BAV, balloon aortic valvuloplasty; PVL, paravalvular leak; patient. TAVI, transcatheter aortic valve implantation.