Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Psychophysiology. 2019 Aug 13;56(12):e13454. doi: 10.1111/psyp.13454

Table 6.

Performance and Appraisal Ratings by Cluster in the 3-Cluster Solution by Dataset.

Dataset 1 Dataset 2
Blue Cluster Green Cluster Black Cluster Blue Cluster Green Cluster Black Cluster
Stress Ratings
 Before Task 3.10(1.02) 3.10 (1.00) 3.00 (1.17) 5.39 (2.26) 5.31 (2.21) 3.67 (1.73)
 During Task 3.30 (1.01) 3.09 (1.08) 3.27 (1.20)
 After Task 3.59 (1.01) 3.25 (1.18) 3.40 (1.07) 5.89 (2.20) 5.15 (2.58) 3.78 (1.99)
Coping Ratings
 Before Task 3.87 (0.98) 3.81 (0.96) 3.73 (1.08) 6.74 (1.66) 7.38 (1.12) 7.67 (0.87)
 During Task 3.75 (0.87) 3.67 (1.00) 3.63 (0.96)
 After Task 3.48 (1.16) 3.63 (1.19) 3.27 (1.39) 6.45 (2.10) 6.62 (2.02) 7.89 (1.27)
Responses Attempted
 Mini 14.68 (7.28) 13.67 (7.04) 14.97 (7.38) 11.03 (6.47) 11.23 (5.33) 16.33 (5.32)
 Min2 10.21 (5.43) 9.44 (4.08) 10.33 (6.19) 9.15 (5.31) 9.15 (4.30) 10.00 (3.97)
 Min3+ 11.96 (6.66) 12.41 (6.28) 12.09 (6.46) 11.25 (6.25) 11.23 (5.13) 13.11 (5.26)
 Min 4 9.48 (5.70) 10.54 (4.08) 9.56 (6.11)
 Min5 9.20(5.81) 11.15(4.41) 12.67 (7.02)
Proportion Correct
 Mini 0.80 (0.25) 0.80 (0.26) 0.83 (0.27) 0.69 (0.54) 0.65 (0.62) 0.97 (0.05)
 Min 2 0.77 (0.32) 0.74 (0.35) 0.81 (0.33) 0.83 (0.24) 0.76 (0.31) 0.90 (0.08)
 Min3+ 0.81 (0.23) 0.78 (0.26) 0.76 (0.24) 0.85 (0.29) 0.88 (0.14) 0.90 (0.19)
 Min 4 0.66 (0.60) 0.83 (0.25) 0.74 (0.37)
 Min 5 0.70 (0.44) 0.71 (0.68) 0.81 (0.32)

Note: One-way ANOVAs were used to compare participants across clusters within each Dataset. Equal variances were not assumed where appropriate. No differences passed Bonferroni-corrected alpha levels for multiple comparisons. Proportion correct was calculated only from participants who attempted at least 1 response.

+

For Dataset 1, responses attempted and proportion correct in Minute 3 reflect performance in the third trial of the task (minutes 3 and 4 combined).