Table 6.
Best case scenario for the person-centered account of moral judgment under the assumption that everyone in a subpopulation of size p satisfies the theory without exception. Each of the bottom six rows contains the effect size d (from the pipeline project meta-analysis) and upper bounds on qi, the proportion of variance attributed to individual differences, for six different values of p.
| p | 0.6 | 0.7 | 0.8 | 0.9 | 0.95 | 0.99 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| d | zp | 0.2533 | 0.5244 | 0.8416 | 1.2816 | 1.6449 | 2.3263 |
| 1.27 | q1 | ≤1 | ≤1 | ≤1 | ≤0.49 | ≤ 0.30 | ≤0.15 |
| 2.05 | q2 | ≤1 | ≤1 | ≤1 | ≤1 | ≤ 0.78 | ≤0.39 |
| 0.57 | q3 | ≤1 | ≤0.59 | ≤0.23 | ≤0.10 | ≤ 0.06 | ≤0.030 |
| 0.41 | q4 | ≤1 | ≤0.31 | ≤0.12 | ≤0.05 | ≤ 0.031 | ≤0.016 |
| 0.51 | q5 | ≤1 | ≤0.47 | ≤0.18 | ≤0.079 | ≤ 0.048 | ≤0.024 |
| 0.70 | q6 | ≤1 | ≤0.89 | ≤0.35 | ≤0.15 | ≤ 0.091 | ≤0.045 |