Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Prev Med. 2019 Oct 2;57(5):601–610. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2019.06.019

Table 1.

Participant Characteristics by Trial Arm

Characteristics Control arm n=200 n (%) Health warning arm n=200 n (%)
Age, years
 18–29 125 (63) 132 (66)
 30–39 47 (24) 41 (21)
 40–54 22 (11) 19 (10)
 ≥55 6 (3) 8 (4)
 Mean (SD) 29.0 (10.3) 29.0 (10.5)
Gender
 Male 83 (42) 76 (38)
 Female 115 (58) 121 (61)
 Transgender or other 2 (1) 3 (2)
Gay, lesbian, or bisexual 21 (11) 20 (10)
Hispanic 25 (13) 9 (5)
Race
 White 87 (44) 93 (47)
 Black or African American 46 (23) 43 (22)
 Asian 47 (24) 51 (26)
 Other/multiraciala 17 (9) 12 (6)
Low education (some college or less)b 47 (24) 47 (24)
Limited health literacyc 40 (20) 34 (17)
Household income, annual
 $0–$24,999 47 (24) 49 (25)
 $25,000–$49,999 61 (31) 54 (27)
 $50,000–$74,999 22 (11) 34 (17)
 ≥$75,000 69 (35) 63 (32)
Sugar-sweetened beverage consumption
 Low (≤60 oz/weekd) 103 (52) 100 (50)
 High (>60 oz/weekd) 97 (49) 100 (50)
Overweight (BMI ≥25 kg/m2) 93 (47) 72 (36)

Note: Missing demographic data ranged from 0% to 1%. In the 11 balance tests conducted, two statistically significant differences between the health warning and control arm were observed: proportion Hispanic (p=0.004) and proportion overweight (p=0.03).

a

Includes participants who marked “other race,” American Indian/Native American, Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, or who marked multiple races.

b

Educational attainment for participants ≤25 years (who may still be completing degrees) was assessed using mother’s or father’s educational attainment, whichever was higher.

c

“Possibility” or “high likelihood” of limited health literacy based on score on the Newest Vital Sign questionnaire.50

d

Sample median.