Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Jul 8.
Published in final edited form as: ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2019 Jun 11;5(7):3663–3675. doi: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.8b01568

Figure 7. Comparison between computed and experimental systolic wall stress.

Figure 7

Values of left ventricular end-systolic stress experienced by cardiomyocytes within the human heart were calculated by modeling the ventricle as a prolate spheroid-shaped pressure vessel. (A) Loads produced by our magnetic afterload device were calculated, assuming a circular tissue cross-section and that 20% of the EHT cross-sectional area was occupied by cardiomyocytes. Where, k is the post stiffness, d is the tissue diameter, σ is the calculated tissue stress, and σc is the cardiomyocyte-perceived stress. (B) Published values of left ventricular diameters, wall thickness, and pressure at end systole were used to estimate stress from 16 to 40 weeks of gestation. (C) A previously established equation was used to calculate stress from birth onwards28. (C) The blue regions in the graphs indicate the range of stresses applied by the afterload device, where the upper and lower bounds are indicated by dashed lines.