Coco 2003.
Methods |
|
|
Participants |
|
|
Interventions | Treatment group
Control group
Co‐interventions
|
|
Outcomes |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Computer‐generated number system |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Insufficient information to permit judgement |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | High risk | IV versus oral therapy. Unlikely to be blinded |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Insufficient information to permit judgement |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | High risk | 13 out of 72 patients did not complete the study and their data were excluded from analysis |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | High risk | Did not report patient‐level outcomes including graft function or fracture. No protocol published before published trial was completed |
Other bias | High risk | Imbalance in gender and time on dialysis between treatment groups |