Coco 2012.
| Methods |
|
|
| Participants |
|
|
| Interventions | Treatment group
Control group
Co‐interventions
|
|
| Outcomes |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Risk of bias | ||
| Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
| Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Computer‐generated sequence |
| Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Randomisation was done by pharmacist using computer‐generated randomisation. Reported in insufficient detail to perform adjudication |
| Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Identical placebo achieved by over encapsulation of the risedronate capsules to appear similar to the placebo |
| Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Insufficient information to permit judgement |
| Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | High risk | 13/42 participants were not included in entire follow up for reasons that may have been related to outcome |
| Selective reporting (reporting bias) | High risk | Patient‐centred outcomes were not systematically evaluated or reported |
| Other bias | Low risk | Study appears free of other biases |