El‐Agroudy 2003a.
Methods |
|
|
Participants |
|
|
Interventions | Treatment group
Control group
Co‐interventions
|
|
Outcomes |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Computer generated sequence |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Low risk | Randomised treatment allocation was concealed in sequentially numbered and sealed opaque envelopes |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | High risk | Single‐blind |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Insufficient information to permit judgement |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | All patients completed 1 year of the study |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | Patient‐centred outcomes captured and reported systematically |
Other bias | Unclear risk | No additional threats to validity identified |