Grotz 2001.
Methods |
|
|
Participants |
|
|
Interventions | Treatment group
Control group
Co‐interventions
|
|
Outcomes |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Insufficient information to permit judgement |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Insufficient information to permit judgement |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | High risk | Unblinded study |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | All X‐rays were evaluated by a radiologist who was blinded to the randomisation |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | 8/80 patients did not complete the study with equal numbers in each group |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | Patient‐centred outcomes including graft function were reported |
Other bias | Low risk | No additional threats to validity identified |